<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: </title>
	<atom:link href="http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594</link>
	<description>For writers, readers, and independent thinkers--book talk for readers and writers, life chats when we need them, writers' motivational articles, secret behind-the-scenes stories from the publishing trenches, and more.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 11 Mar 2010 19:13:20 -0500</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: RM1(SS) (ret)</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8495</link>
		<dc:creator>RM1(SS) (ret)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 22:32:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8495</guid>
		<description>USS &lt;i&gt;Thresher&lt;/i&gt; (SSN 593).

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Thresher_%28SSN-593%29

Patrick: All of them sink.  We prefer to be on the ones that come back up. 8)  That&#039;s the big thing about skimmers (surface ships) - just doesn&#039;t make sense to me to go out to sea on something that wasn&#039;t designed to come back up again after it sinks....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>USS <i>Thresher</i> (SSN 593).</p>
<p><a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Thresher_%28SSN-593%29" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/USS_Thresher_%28SSN-593%29</a></p>
<p>Patrick: All of them sink.  We prefer to be on the ones that come back up. <img src='http://robinbrande.com/wp/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_cool.gif' alt='8)' class='wp-smiley' />  That&#8217;s the big thing about skimmers (surface ships) &#8211; just doesn&#8217;t make sense to me to go out to sea on something that wasn&#8217;t designed to come back up again after it sinks&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Patrick</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8493</link>
		<dc:creator>Patrick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 20:27:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8493</guid>
		<description>Wasn&#039;t there a film?

http://www.submariners.co.uk/Dits/Articles/U593.htm

Most sub guys will prefer to be on one that doesn&#039;t sink.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wasn&#8217;t there a film?</p>
<p><a href="http://www.submariners.co.uk/Dits/Articles/U593.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.submariners.co.uk/Dits/Articles/U593.htm</a></p>
<p>Most sub guys will prefer to be on one that doesn&#8217;t sink.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8477</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 21 Aug 2007 03:46:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8477</guid>
		<description>RM1, excuse my ignorance, but we submariners would prefer 594 because . . .?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>RM1, excuse my ignorance, but we submariners would prefer 594 because . . .?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RM1(SS) (ret)</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8474</link>
		<dc:creator>RM1(SS) (ret)</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 23:31:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8474</guid>
		<description>As far as we submariners are concerned, it would be much better to be on the 594 than on the 593....</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As far as we submariners are concerned, it would be much better to be on the 594 than on the 593&#8230;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8461</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:04:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8461</guid>
		<description>Never heard of pudgie pies?  You haven&#039;t lived until you&#039;ve had a pudgie pie oozing with cherry pie filling.  I think I&#039;ve eaten at least 594 of them!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Never heard of pudgie pies?  You haven&#8217;t lived until you&#8217;ve had a pudgie pie oozing with cherry pie filling.  I think I&#8217;ve eaten at least 594 of them!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8460</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 15:00:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8460</guid>
		<description>Keith, never heard of pudgy pies, but obviously they must be included.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Keith, never heard of pudgy pies, but obviously they must be included.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Keith</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8459</link>
		<dc:creator>Keith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 20 Aug 2007 14:52:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8459</guid>
		<description>Whatever list you guys are on has something to do with 594 men in little white coats.  I&#039;m on that list too.  Where&#039;s the campfire and s&#039;mores?  Anyone up for pudgy pies?  I&#039;m camping out.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatever list you guys are on has something to do with 594 men in little white coats.  I&#8217;m on that list too.  Where&#8217;s the campfire and s&#8217;mores?  Anyone up for pudgy pies?  I&#8217;m camping out.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8398</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8398</guid>
		<description>Cool!  We made the List together!

Oh, wait--different list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Cool!  We made the List together!</p>
<p>Oh, wait&#8211;different list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Barry</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8397</link>
		<dc:creator>Barry</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 21:04:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8397</guid>
		<description>I get that spam, too, Robin. Looks like we&#039;re on the same list.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I get that spam, too, Robin. Looks like we&#8217;re on the same list.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: robin</title>
		<link>http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594/comment-page-1#comment-8394</link>
		<dc:creator>robin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 16 Aug 2007 16:54:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://robinbrande.com/uncategorized/594#comment-8394</guid>
		<description>Eisha, crack.  Me. Up. 

Jen, my reaction exactly.

Thought you&#039;d all appreciate this:  lately one of the spams I&#039;ve been getting--including for this post--says, &quot;I couldn’t understand some parts of this article [spam portion], but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.&quot;

For once that just might apply.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Eisha, crack.  Me. Up. </p>
<p>Jen, my reaction exactly.</p>
<p>Thought you&#8217;d all appreciate this:  lately one of the spams I&#8217;ve been getting&#8211;including for this post&#8211;says, &#8220;I couldn’t understand some parts of this article [spam portion], but I guess I just need to check some more resources regarding this, because it sounds interesting.&#8221;</p>
<p>For once that just might apply.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
